168 Lung Cancer, non-small cell (NSCLC)
31. Lung Cancer, non small cell (NSCLC)
31.1 General considerations
Stage grouping |
|
Stage 0 Tis N0 M0 |
|
Stage Ia T1 N0 M0 |
|
Stage Ib T2 N0 M0 |
|
Stage IIa T 1 N1 M0 |
|
Stage IIb T2 N1 M0 T3 N0 M0 |
|
Stage IIIa T3 N1 M0 T 1 3 N2 M0 |
|
Stage IIIb T 1 3 N3 M0 T4 N0-3 M0 |
|
Stage IV any T any N M 1 |
Surgical resection is described as the preferred therapy for patients with respectable NSCLC (stage I, II and selected IIIa), although it fails to cure a considerable number of patients. Radiotherapy can be applied alternatively as a definitive treatment for medically inoperable disease in patients with early stage NSCLC and also post-operatively to enhance local tumor control. Studies exploring postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy so far have not demonstrated a positive impact on survival. On the other hand promising results were reported for a multimodality approach of induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy followed by surgery and/ or radiotherapy (first of all in patients with respectable stage III disease but now also under investigation in earlier stages).
For patients with non-resectable NSCLC ( stage IIIB/IV) in good clinical condition (WHO PS≤1) combination chemotherapy either alone or in association with radiotherapy is now established as first-line treatment , resulting in survival benefit, symptom reduction, and improved quality of life. For patients with PS > 1 and elderly patients single agent chemotherapy results in better palliation than palliative care (incl. radiation) alone. At progression after (platinum-based) front-line chemotherapy docetaxel seems to result in a small survival benefit compared to supportive care alone.
Literature: for review e.g.
BONOMI, Semin. Oncol. 28 (Suppl 14) (2001): 45 49 (novel treatment
approaches)
BUNN, Oncology 15 (Suppl 6) (2001) : 26 32
DEPIERRE et al, Cancer Treat, Rev. 27 (2001): 119 127 (preoperative
chemotherapy)
FOSSELLA, Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2 (2000): 96 101 (second- line
chemotherapy)
GANDARA et al, Semin. Oncol. 28 (Suppl 9 ) (2001): 26 32 (chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC)
GRIDELLI, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 35 (2000): 219 225 (chemotherapy in elderly patients)
HAURA, Cancer Control 8 (2001): 326-336 (review of current randomized trials in advanced NSCLC)
HUISMAN et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 18 (2000); 3722-3730 (second-line chemotherapy)
KHURI et al, Ann. Oncol. 12 (2001): 739 744
Lung Cancer, non-small cell (NSCLC) 169
KOTAS et al, Lung Cancer 33 (Suppl 1) (2001): 61-64 (sequential chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC)
MANEGOLD, Lung Cancer 34 (Suppl 2) (2001) : 165 170
(chemotherapy) and Oncology 15 (Suppl 6) (2001): 46 51
(chemotherapy in elderly patients)
MEERT et al, Anticancer Res. 19 (1999) ; 4379-4390 (systematic review of phase II and III studies with new drugs)
NICUM and CULLEN, Anticancer Drugs 11(2000): 603-607 (chemotherapy vs palliativecare)
NOVELLO and LeCHEVALIER, Eur. J.Cancer 38(2002): 292-299(chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC )
NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER COLLABORATIVE GROUP, Br. Med. J.311(1995): 899-904 (meta-analysis of chemotherapy vs palliative care)
NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER EXPERT PANEL, J.Clin. Oncol. 15(1997) :2996-3018(ASCO clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of unresectable NSCLC)
PISTERS, Semin. Oncol. 28(Suppl 14) (2001) : 23-28(adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for early stage NSCLC )
ROSELL et al , Semin. Oncol . 28 (Suppl 2 ) (2001) : 28-34 (molecular markers )
SMYTHE.Cancer Control 8(2001) : 318-325 (stage I and II NSCLC )
SORENSON et al, Acta Oncol. 40 (2001) : 327-339 (systematic overview of chemotherapy )
SWEENEY and SANDLER , Invest . N. Drugs 18 (2000) : 157-186 ) chemotherapy)
SWISHER and ROTH, Curr. Rep. 2(2000): 64-70 (gene therapy)
THATCHER, Lung Cancer 34 (Suppl 2) (2001) :171-175 (chemotherapy)
Van ZANDWIJK, Lung Cancer 34 (Supple 2) (2001) : 145-150 (neoadjuvant strategies)
31.2 Single agent chemotherapy
31.2.1 Docetaxel
Literature : for review e.g.
COMER and GOA , Drugs Aging 17 (2000) :53-80
GREEN, Anticancer Drugs 12 (Suppl 1) (2001) : 11-16
LA NGER , Invest. New Drugs 18 (2000) : 17-28
MILLER and KRIS , Semin. Oncol. 27(Suppl 3) (2001) : 3-10
SHEPHERD et al, Semin. Oncol. 28(Suppl 2) (2001) :4 - 9
|
Docetaxel 75*or 100 mg/m2** i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks
* For chemotherapy- pretreated patients
** For chemotherapy- naive patients
Literature:
FOSELLA et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 18(2000) : 2354 2362
SHEPHERD et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 18(2000) : 2095 2103
31.2.2 Gemcitabine
Literature : for review e.g.
JOHNSON, Oncology 15 (Suppl 6) (2001) : 33-39
KELLY, Ann. Oncol. 10 (Suppl 5) (1999) : 53-56
MANEGOLD et al, Invest. New Drugs 18 (2000) : 29-42
|
Gemcitabine 1000-1250 mg/m2 i.v. (30 min inf) d 1,8,15 |
To be repeated every 4 weeks
170 Lung Cancer, non small cell (NSCLC)
Literature:
ANDERSON et al, j. Clin. Oncol. 12 (1994): 1821 1826
GATZEMEIER et al, Eur. J. Cancer 32 A(1996): 243-248
31.2.3. Vinorelbine
Literature: for review e.g.
GRALLA et al, Ann. Oncol. 10 (Suppl 5) (1999): 41-45
WOZNIAk, Semin. Oncol. 26 (Suppl 16) (1999): 62 66
|
Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. (20 min inf) d 1, 8, 15 |
To be repeated every 4 weeks
Literature:
LeCHEVALIER et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 12 (1994): 360-367 (randomized
study of vinorelbine vs vinorelbine + cisplatin vs vindesine + cisplatin)
31.3 Combination chemotherapy
31.3.1. Platinum-based regimens
31.3.1.1. MIC
Mitomycin 6 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) d 1 |
|
Ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2 i.v. (3 h inf) d 1 With mesna uroprotection |
|
Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks (max 4 courses)
Literature:
CULLEN et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 17 (1999): 3188-3194 (report of two randomized, parallel trials to determine the effect of added chemotherapy on duration and quality of life in localized, unresectable, and extensive NSCLC)
ROSELL et al, N. Engl. J. Med. 330 (1994): 153-158 (randomized trial of neoadjuvant MIC followed by surgery vs surgery alone)
or
Mitomycin 6 mg/m2 i.v. (bolus) d 1 |
|
Ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2 i.v. (3 h inf) d 1 With mesna uroprotection |
|
Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks (max 6 courses)
Literature:
CRINO et al, Ann. Oncol. 8 (1997): 709 711
31.3.1.2 Cisplatin + Etoposide
Literature: for review
ARDIZZONI et al, Ann. Oncol. 10 (Suppl 5) (1999): 13 17
This second-geneation regimen may still represent a reasonable choice for patients with stage IV NSCLC when cost issues are of concern. It is also an option when no clear distinction between small cell and non-small cell histology can be made. E.g.
Lung Cancer, non small cell (NSCLC) 171
|
Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
|
Etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v.(45 min inf) d 1-3 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks
Literature:
BONOMI et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 18 (2000): 623-631
31.3.1.3 Cisplatin + Vinorelbine
|
Cisplatin 120 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 + 29 Then every 6 wks |
|
Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v.(20 min inf) d 1, 8, 15 .. |
or
|
Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v. d 1, 8, 15 |
|
Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 |
To be repeated every 4 weeks ( in the absence of progression or intolerable toxicity for a minimum of 6 cycles)
Literature:
KELLY et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2001) : 3210-3218 (randomized phase III trial of the SWOG of paclitaxel + carboplatin vs vinorelbine + cisplatin)
31.3.1.4 NIP (VIP)
|
Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v.(slow bolus) d 1+ 8 |
|
Ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2 i.v. ( 2 h inf) d 1 With mesna uroprotection |
|
Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks (for IIIb NSCLC 3 courses as induction followed by radiotherapy in case of CR, PR, or SD: 2 Gy/d, 5 d/week, total dose 60 Gy starting 4-6 weeks after the end of induction chemotherapy)
Literature:
BALDINI et al, Ann. Oncol. 7 (1996): 747-749 and Semin. Oncol. 27
(Suppl 1) (2000): 28-32
31.3.1.5 Paclitaxel + Cisplatin
|
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. (3 h inf) d 1 |
|
Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks
Literature:
GIACCONE et al, J. Clin . Oncol. 16 (1998): 2133-2141 (randomized
study of the EORTC comparing paclitaxel + cisplatin and cisplatin +
teniposide)
172 Lung Cancer, non small cell (NSCLC)
or
|
Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. (24 h inf) d 1 |
|
Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks
Literature:
SCHILLER et al, N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (2002); 92-98 (randomized comparison of four chemotherapy regimens by the ECOG)
31.3.1.6 Paclitaxel + Carboplatin
Literature: for review e.g.
BONOMI, Semin. Oncol. 26 (Suppl 2) (1999): 55-59
|
Paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 i.v. (3 h inf) d 1 |
|
Carboplatin AUC = 6 i.v. (15min inf) d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks ( in the absence of progression or intolerable toxicity for a minimum of 6 cycles)
Literature:
SCHILLER et al, N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (2002): 92-98 (randomized comparison of four chemotherapy regimens by the ECOG)
KELLY et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 19 (2001): 3210-3218 (randomized phase III
trial of the SWOG of paclitaxel + carboplatin vs vinorelbine + cisplatin)
31.3.1.7 Docetaxel + Cisplatin
Literature : for review e.g.
BELANI and LYNCH, Semin. Oncol. 28 (Suppl 2) (2001): 10 14
|
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 |
|
Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks
Literature:
SCHILLER et al, N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (2002) : 92-98 (randomized comparison of four chemotherapy regimens by the ECOG)
or
|
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. (1 h inf) d 1 |
|
Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. ( 1 h inf) d 1 (1 h after DOC) |
To be repeated every 3 weeks for 3 cycles, then every 6 weeks.
Literature:
LeCHEVALIER et al, Eur. J. Cancer 34 (1998): 2032- 2036
Lung Cancer, non small cell (NSCLC) 173
31.3.1.8 Gemcitabine + Cisplatin
Literature: for review e.g.
CARTEI et al, Ann. Oncol. 10 (Suppl 5) (1999): 57 62
|
Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 i.v. (30-60 min inf) d 1, 8., 15 |
|
Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. ( 30-120 min inf) d 1 1** or 2* |
To be repeated every 4 weeks
Literature:
* CRINO et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 17 (1999): 3522-3530 ( randomized phase II
study of GC vs MIC)
** SANDLER et al, J. Clin. Oncol. 18 ( 2000) : 122 130 ( phase III
international trial of GC vs cisplatin )
SCHILLER et al, N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (2002): 92-98 (randomized
comparision of four chemotherapy regimens by the ECOG)
31.3.2 Non- platinum combinations
The following regimens are only examples for a relatively new development.
31.3.2.1 Gemcitabine + Vinorelbine
|
Gemcitabine 1200mg/m2 i.v. d 1+ 8 |
|
Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. d 1 + 8 |
To be repeated every 3 weeks ( for a maximum of 6 cycles)
Literature:
FRASCI et al, J. Clin. 18 (2000): 2529-2536 (randomized comparison of gemcitabine + vinorelbine vs vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC)
31.3.2.2.GIN
|
Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 i.v. (2 h inf) d 1 and 800 mg/m2 i.v. (2 h inf) d 4 |
|
Ifosfamide 3000 mg/m2 i.v. (2 h inf) d 1 With mesna uroprotection |
|
Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v. (slow bolus) d 1 and 20 mg/m2 i.v. (slow bolus) d 4 |
To be repeated every 3 week
Literature:
BALDINI et al, Br. J. Cancer 85 (2001) : 1452 1455
31.4 Selective inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase Gefitinib ( Iressa)
|
Gefitinib 250mg/d p.o. |
Salvage treatment after ( platinum based) chemotherapy.
Note: Gefitinib has the potential to cause severe acute interstitial pneumonia, especiallity in patients with previous thoracic irradiation and poor performance status.
174 Lung Cancer, non small cell (NSCLC)
Literature:
FUKUKOA et al, Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 22 (2002) : 298a (final results form
study IDEAL 1)
INOUE et al, Lancet 361 (2003): 137 139 (severe acute interstitial pneumonia)
KRIS et al, Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 22 (2002): 292a ( results from study
IDEAL 2)